Science is not just being denied, it is under attack. Some conservative politicians and media constantly deny reality to promote their ideologies of control and mass profits for themselves. The goal of despotic tyrants is to deny anything is wrong to keep people from thinking and asking questioning, such as whether or not the depots should be in power. An uninformed public is easy to manipulate with fear, attacks on those who are different and other lies.
This behavior is not restricted to the United States where people now in power have made false accusations that vaccines are dangerous or cause autism with no evidence to back up these claims, all of which have all been debunked repeatedly. The conservative government of Alberta in Canada, for instance, has just released a report stating vaccines are ineffective against viruses and dangerous with the conclusion no one should take them. Dr. Gary Davidson, a vaccine denier and one of the authors, stated “Science is not a narrative or consensus but thoughtful, public discourse. An ‘international scientific collaboration and consensus’ sounds like a conspiracy, and I stand firmly against conspiracy theories.”
Dr. Davidson is dangerously wrong. Superstition is a consensus of a the public. Science is the methodical examination of the world to understand how it works. As more facts are uncovered and a deeper understanding is reached about the physical world, scientists will alter their conclusions to fit the facts. Despotic politicians and media alter the facts to fit their ideologies.
Science is not an international conspiracy. Science has no ideology, any more than the sun rising in the morning does. It is just reality. There are no alternate facts, only people trying to twist things to their advantage. Yet, reality can conflict with those who seek to take and hold power. The first thing any tyrannical government does is control the message of the media. The Nazis did it. The Soviets did it. Vladimir Putin is doing it. Now, selfish and power mad people in the west are doing it.
Don’t buy into this. Don’t let those who have seized power in certain areas lie to you so they can retain power over everyone. Become informed. Think. Question. Discover the facts and demand those who make statements provide documented, peer reviewed proof, not just assumption. Fact checking is vital. A democracy only works when people do these things. To blindly accept the word of a billionaire or politician with vested interests in taking more is the death of democracy.
I was very impressed with Dune part I but was disappointed my part II. The love story between Paul and Cheney, which is so important to Frank Hubert's book, was lost. She was turned into an angry and confrontation character on the currently held false belief that for a woman to appear strong she must become antagonistic. Paul and Chaney support each other in the book. In the movie she comes off as selfish and rude. At the end of the book, Chaney knows that Pail is marrying the emperor's daughter for political reasons and will never love or sleep with her. Chaney will bear Paul's heir. She will hold that power. She does not run off in a huff and ride a worm.
The movie leaves out the birth of Paul's sister, Alia, a vital part of the plot of the book because she is born aware and is the first to confront the emperor. She is so powerful, she silences the Bene Gesserit who have been manipulating genetic parings for centuries for their own purposes. Alia stops their plans.
Now, I support strong women in literature and cinema. My books are filled with strong, competent women in major roles. In my fantasy trilogy The Carandir Saga, some wield swords. Still, all are female characters, not testosterone filled male characters with female names. Women are powerful as women and in many respects stronger than men, such as in social power and pain endurance. It is true, women have been subjugated for millennia in many cultures, including the one we currently live in, denied opportunities given to men and treated as property to be possessed. Yet to think a woman has to become a man to succeed sets back woman’s’ rights.
Motion pictures are a different media than books and changes must be made to fit that media where there is only sight and sound. Producers, directors and screenwriters who change the temperament and essence of characters or the themes of the author to fit some current idea of social acceptance, which can change in years or even weeks, are creating their own story and should not label it as the book author's work or title.
Dune Part II makes these mistakes. I realize they set things up for a Dune Part III, but I won’t go to see it.
I just heard King Charles’ annual Christmas message. It was not broadcast from Buckingham palace. Rather, the king spoke from an interfaith chapel. He praised health care workers around the world for their contribution and sacrifice and of his personal experience with cancer. His majesty shared his concerns for wars in Eastern Europe, Africa and the Middle East, and the suffering of so many innocent people. His message was one of love, charity and tolerance for all as expressed in Christianity and every other faith on the planet. He talked about violence recently committed by a few in Great Britain against others and the response of so many who came together not to answer violence with violence, but to both rebuild structures and heal social wounds and relationships.
The speech was in contrast with despotic and vengeful leaders around the world who hold power over others, or are about to. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth leads to everyone being blind and toothless.
One thing His Majesty covered was how Jesus lived among the poor and ill, not the rich and powerful who could buy anything, including political influence. If we all lived with the principals King Charles spoke of that are found at the root of every religion; to care for one another, no longer embrace the desire to accumulate wealth beyond their needs, stop seeking power over others and end the exclusion of those outside their group, the horrors of war, hunger and poverty would end.
Yet, so many today seek power and wealth with no regard to the harm and suffering they cause. There are those who seek revenge on any who challenged them. So many who claim to be Christians forget the teachings of love and acceptance, and cherry pick passages in the old and new testaments to twist in an attempt to justify their lying and cheating to exclude any who are different as they seize power to gain wealth.
For those who call themselves Christians, consider the following on Christmas day.
If you embrace only commerce without compassion, remember how a rich man wanted to become one of Jesus’ disciples and Jesus told him to give away all his possessions to the poor and follow him. When the rich man turned and left, Jesus said, “It is easier for a rope to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven.” It is not that the rich are damned, it is they must worship through their souls, not their money.
For those who abuse others with different colors of skin or different beliefs, remember the story of the Jewish man who fell and lay unaided while none of the other influential people stopped to help, until a Samaritan, a member of a despised minority, helped the man stand, took him to his home and tended him until he was well. Charity extends to all, whether they are a part of your group or not.
For those who seek revenge on others who challenged or wronged them, recall the story of the woman accused of adultery who was brought before Jesus by a group of men who told him by law the woman must be stoned to death. Jesus looked at them and said, “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” One by one, the men left until Jesus was alone with the woman. He asked, “Where are your accusers?” The woman said they had left. Jesus said, “Then I do not accuse you either. Go and sin no more.” Forgiveness, not revenge and punishment, is at the heart of Christianity, though far too many forget this.
For those who tie politics to religion and say God has ordained certain actions and leaders, remember the time a group of men thought to trick Jesus when they asked if Jews should pay Roman taxes, thinking if he answered yes the other Jews would stop following him and if he answered no the Romans would arrest him. Instead, Jesus looked at a Roman coin and asked whose image was on it. When the men said Ceaser’s, Jesus said, “Render onto Ceaser what is Ceaser’s. Render onto God what is God’s.” No leader is ordained. There is a reason the framers of the Constitution of the United Sates of America added the first amendment to separate church from state.
Peace on Earth and good will to all is not exclusive to Christianity. These ideals are enshrined in religions around the world because all of them set social standards to care for each other and work together to achieve the good of society and each individual. Isolated, people spiral into greed, avarice, selfishness and self-loathing because they can never get what they truly desire, love from others.
My works examine the human condition and allow readers to contemplate their own lives. Some people find this offensive because it challenges their world view. None of my books mention any current politician or party, yet the themes of misogyny, racism, intolerance. discrimination, incompetence, tyranny, corruption, lies and deceit are expressed as these things have existed for ages. They can all be found in the current world. I’m interested in making statements rather than trying to please or placate large groups of readers. When I’m dead, all the money in the world will make no difference, yet if I can spark an idea that makes the world a better place, I will have accomplished something important.
Dungeons & Dragons, the fantasy role playing game, turns 50 this year. My high school friend, Jeff, introduced me to the game and I was hooked. A group of us would get together and play for hours. For those unfamiliar with the game, one person is the dungeon master who crates the world and challenges players will face. Based largely on J.R.R. Tolkien's
The Lord of the Rings, players choose a character such as a wizard, elf, warrior, dwarf, hobbit or other imaginary being. They create their background stories and personal goals, then join with the other players as adventurers.
The dungeon master presents them with challenges, such as being attacked by a band of orcs when searching for a magical amulet. Each player, in turn, says what their character does. Wizards may throw fireballs. Warriors may charge with swords. Elves might shoot arrows. Dungeon masters control the opposing creatures. They role multi-sided dice and consult charts to determine success or failure.
It’s a unique game. There is no competition among players. Everyone must work together to achieve the goals of finding treasure, learning magic and winning battles. Ultimate success comes from the players working together as a team, a life lesson people in the real world could benefit from.
My first fantasy novel,
Dragons Unremembered, began as a scenario when I acted as a dungeon master in one campaign. The group of adventurers are in a tavern when an old man tells them about a treasure in a cave guarded by a dragon. I could have left it there and let the players create the story as they fought the dragon. Something inside me pushed to embellish the story, add new traps, create secondary characters for the players to interact with and develop twists.
Eventually, I realized this could be a book, so I wrote one. It was terrible. I had no idea how to write a novel. After years of study under a bestselling novelist and volumes of books about writing, I developed the skills, craft and my own voice. I abandoned the fantasy book and wrote
Beyond the Shallow Bank, historical fiction with elements of Celtic mythology. When I finished that book, I looked back at the original fantasy, saw it had exciting elements, thew out most of the material, and rewrote it from scratch to become the first book in
The Carandir Saga trilogy.
Unlike video games that present pre-programmed stimulation, role playing games like Dungeons & Dragons engage the imagination of players who form the worlds in their minds and make completely free choices outside of any machine control. Players, not computer programmers, decide what actions are possible. I’m certain other writers of fantasy literature were inspired by the game as well. For those who don’t go on to write books, the experience of cooperation and comradeship gives a sense of community people can take back into the real world.
Since 1999, many people have participated in the National Novel Writing Month, known more commonly as NaNoWriMo, to write the first draft of a 50,000-word novel or the beginning of a novel between November 1st and 30th. I’ve never personally participated. It takes me several months to complete a first draft as I explore the subjects, characters, plot and themes of a book. Still, many people find the time constraint of NaNoWriMo just the push they need to finish and have a great time. Up to now, everything submitted has been created by humans.
This year, the organization behind NaNoWriMo posted a statement on its website saying it, “does not explicitly support any specific approach to writing, nor does it explicitly condemn any approach, including the use of AI.”
A great backlash has come from writers, editors and even people on the NaNoWriMo board of directors who have resigned. I am appalled by this decision. If someone can use an AI robot to write a story, what worth is the exercise? It’s not the user of AI who created anything. Having AI submissions makes the whole concepts of NaNoWriMo worthless.
It is in the act of writing where we consider what we want to say and sometimes change our positions in the process as we better understand the materiel and characters while we uncover new ideas and perspectives.
When I write, I carefully consider the words I use and the structure I implore. This hones my mind to truly see what I want to achieve. I never use AI to write stories or even tools like Grammarly to suggest words, structure or plot points. The knowledge of these things as a writer is what allows people to create stories where the craft becomes second nature, like riding a bike or driving, and we can concentrate on the stories and characters. Tools such as Grammarly can be a good learning experience to train on, yet when people continue to rely on these supports and don’t train themselves to write effectively, they fail to communicate their own ideas.
I spent years learning how to write; how to put sentences together, how to form pacing, how to create fully formed, engaging characters, how to build stories that immerse readers in the world, and perhaps most importantly, how to consider the messages I want to share as I present my themes. For inspiration, I draw not from computer generated suggestions, but from my own experiences, my own opinions (which sometimes change as I see things during the writing process that I didn’t before), articles from reputable news outlets and conversations with others to learn about their views and experiences.
Writing is an art, not a mechanical process. Art is one of the important aspects of humanity that binds people and societies together. When we create and tell each other stories, we share parts of ourselves.
AI can be used for marvelous things to benefit people in weather prediction, medicine, drug development, traffic control, environmental assessments and more. When a machine builds a story, there is no human connection. Artificial intelligence tools should never be used to write stories because machines have no emotions or perspectives. They simply manipulate vast amounts of material written by millions of humans and organize it through a pseudo-neural network feedback loop to mash the material together. Sometimes the modelers pay writers or publishers to use their material. All too often, copyrighted works are just taken from the web, newspapers, magazines and books without permission or compensation. This is, in a real sense, plagiarism.
The term artificial intelligence is itself a misnomer, taken from an age-old desire of humans to create life. There is no intelligence involved. There is no sentience. There are no emotions. There is no compassion. There are just computer programs created by humans in which the programs follow rules laid out that are colored by the views, prejudices and agendas of the programmers. The results can be incomplete and unreliable, and sometimes return misinformation and lies.
Write stories in your own voice. It takes time and effort. Then again, so does living a full and socially engaging life.
I speak with many people when I’m selling my books at the Wolfville Farmers’ Market on Saturday’s. Today, several families with children stopped by. Three of these young people, ages 9 to 10, excitedly shared how they like to write stories and told me their plots. I talked about how rewarding writing is for me and how happy I was that they enjoy telling stories as well. All three smiled broadly. Words are the most powerful thing humans possess. For all I know, the words I spoke today may have inspired a future winner of a Noble Prize for Literature. We can never tell for certain how our small acts of encouragement can change the universe.
When editing your work, you can be so familiar with it your eye doesn’t catch missing words, extra words, wrong words (filed instead of filled), missing punctuation (periods and question marks) and many other mistakes. It helps to read your work aloud to yourself. Many of these things become apparent. Still, your brain can insert or delete things even when you read aloud. Here’s a way to help catch problems.
In Microsoft Word 365, for manuscripts, and Final Draft, for screenplays, you can have the program read your text aloud with a variety of voices. Errors jump out. You hear that missing, extra and wrong word. You hear missing punctuation when two sentences run together. When you listed, you’ll get a sense of pacing and discover words or phrases you repeat. This will help you deliver clean manuscripts and screenplays for movies and television to agents, publishers, producers or insure polished books when you publish yourself, though if you are self-publishing you should always hire a professional editor because the final product needs a human touch, which artificial intelligence can’t provide..
For Word 365, select Review on the menu, then Read Aloud. The program will begin reading aloud from the point of the cursor. It will also display a mini-toolbar to the right hand side. This has a play button, >, a stop button, [], a button to go to the beginning of a line a line, <<, a button to go to the next paragraph, >>, and a button with the icon of a gear over a speaker to adjust the settings.
When you click the settings icon, you can adjust the speed of the voice and the kind of voice you want in a drop-down box. You may see only Male and Female for choices. These are what I see in the Administrator account. On my own account I see three selections, David Microsoft which is a monotone male voice, Zira Microsoft which is a female voice with inflection and Mark Microsoft which is a male voice with inflection. I’m not certain why I see three choices for my own account and only two generic ones for the Administrator.
For Final Draft, you have more setting options. Click Tools on the menu. Under the Speech Control Frame you will see a play button, >, a stop button, [], an Assign Voices button, ))), a fast forward button, >>, that moves forward to the next block (scene, action, dialogue), and a Rewind button, <<, that moves back a block.
The Assign Voices button shows a dialog box with three tabs. The first, Characters, allows you to assign each character one of ten unique voices; Man 1, Man 2, Woman 1, Woman 2, Boy 1, Boy 2, Girl 1, Girl 2, Old Man and Old woman. Initially, these will all sound in the same, a monotone male voice. These can be adjusted on the Third tab, Actors. Here, you can assign a unique male of female voice to each actor by selecting the gender from the drop-down box. You can then adjust the pitch and speed. There is a Preview button to hear what it sounds like and make further adjustments. I see two choices, Microsoft David (male voice) and Microsoft Zira (female voice). You may see other choices or a generic male or female. Because you can adjust pitch and speed, you can crate unique types of any gender.
The second tab, Narrator, allows you to assign a unique voice to the narrator who reads the scenes, action and dialogue. Again, there is a preview button.
Other writing program may have similar features.
You will find these tools a great asset to make your work shine.
I keep back all of my old manuscripts. From time to time, I take one out and read the wretched prose I put down while struggling to learn the craft. That deflates my head every time so it fits through a doorway.
There is a particularly odious passage in a very early version of one of my fantasy novels where a dignitary visits a palace and pike men stand in a line as an an honor guard. I thought the piece was Pulitzer Prize winning material and would elevate the fantasy genre. I would be hailed a brilliant young talent and the book would go on to be a best seller. For reasons known to no force in the universe, I had a fly land in the cheek of one of the soldiers, This was a minor character who would never appear again. As the fly crawled around, the soldier fought to remain at attention. At this point, I actually wrote the words, "To flinch would be a fate worse than death." As we all know, you should avoid cliches like the plague.
I was taking a course in novel writing at the time. The instructor would read two manuscript sections each session and everyone would critique them as a learning exercise. As my piece was read, I slunk lower and lower into my chair. What had seemed so great crumbled into a pile of amateurish mediocrity.
I left the classroom and stood despondent on a street corner next to a trash can. I looked at the manuscript and said out loud to myself, “This is it. Either you accept you don’t know how to write yet, the words are not my blood on the page, comments are not murdering my child and I need to consider each critique to discover how to improve. Otherwise, I have to throw the manuscript in the trash can and never write again.
I chose not to throw the manuscript into the trash. At that instant, I stepped above my ego and became a writer. I didn’t have a published book and hadn’t even finished one, yet I was a writer because I began to work at a professional level.
Years later, after much work, an improved version of that book was a semifinalist in Publisher Weekly’s Booklife Prize with a score of 9.5 our of 10. It also won a silver medal for Literary Sci-fi & Fantasy and bronze medals for Fantasy Action & Adventure and Dragons & Mythical Beasts. None of that would have happened if I hadn't overcome my ego.
Who is telling the story? This is the narrator Whose eyes do we see the action through? This is the point-of-view. These work together to present a window onto the story.
There are four types of narrators: first person, second person, third person and the omniscient narrator.
In first person narration, the main character relays the story as seen by that character. For example, I listened at the keyhole in anticipation as Lord Frazzlefoo said, “Where are my suspenders?” Even though Lord Frazzlefoo has dialogue, it is the first person narrator who hears it and relays the conversation to the reader.
If Lady Poobob was in the garden painting Lord Frazzlefoo’s suspenders green at the same time, the reader won’t learn this unless the first-person narrator observes it or discovers this fact later. First person narration puts everything in the narrator’s point-of-view. This can be limiting. There is no overall grand sense to the story. However, it gives the story a sense of immediacy, as if the main character grabs the reader by the shoulders and shouts, “This is my story. You have to hear it.”
Second person narration is rarely used in novels. It addresses readers as if they are the main character in the story. It can be seen in role playing games or build-your-own-adventure books. It’s always told in present tense, as if the action is happening at the moment the book is read. You listen at the keyhole as Lord Frazzlefoo says, “Where are my suspenders?
Third person narration presents the characters as separate from the action. It can be told from the point-of-view of a single character or through the eyes of many characters. This is often seen in large, epic stories.
Detective Samuels peered through the keyhole as his heart pumped in anticipation. I’ve got you this time, he thought.
Inside the room, Lord Frazzlefoo rummaged through his closet. He was certain he put the suspenders away. “Where are they.” He wondered if Lady Poobob took them.
In the garden, Lady Poobob sat on a bench with Lord Frazzlefoo’s suspenders in her hands. She smiled as she dipped a brush into green paint and slathered it on the braces.
Here we see and hear the story and inner thoughts through the eyes and ears of the detective, Lord Frazzlefoo and the omniscient narrator who describes Lady Poobob’s actions. This is an example of multiple viewpoints.
In third person narration, we can add even more information known to none of the characters through the omniscient narrator who sees, hears and understands everything.
Lady Poobob was certain they’d fetch a hefty price in London. With the telephone out of service, everyone was unaware the market for green suspenders collapsed that morning.
Details are best remembered when given through the eyes of the characters.
Tom felt the cold steel of the railing as he descended the staircase will be remembered better than The steel railing was cold.
Descriptions give the impression of a place or objects. They shouldn’t be travelogues, as in:
Bright sunshine sparkled on the placid waters of the lake surrounded by tall trees whose green leaves were in dark contrast to the blue sky filled with fluffy clouds.
Unless these details are important to the story or character development, they should be condensed.
Sun sparked off the forest lake.
This may be all you need. It gives a feeling for the place. Readers will fill in their own secondary details.
Even in historical fiction, science fiction and fantasy, worlds that are in the past, have yet to occur or never existed, details should be carefully selected to enhance the story and character development. Let the details of a Victorian carriage signal the mood of a character or a social condition. Inform readers the threat an energy field protects a space ship from. Let an epic poem told by a bad in a fantasy story foreshadow events to come. Always put your details to work.
It’s easy to miss problems and mistakes when you edit your manuscript. Our minds tend to fill in words that aren’t there and skip ones that don’t belong.
I go through multiple drafts. The first draft gets ideas, situations, characters and relationships from my mind into a physical form. It’s in rewriting the second, third and subsequent drafts where a manuscript is crafted into a novel.
I write the second draft in a word processor. It’s easy to make corrections, shift blocks of prose around, delete sections and create new material. For the third or fourth draft, depending on how much grunt work I have to do, I print the manuscript out on paper and go through it with a red pen. Things stand out on paper that can be missed on a screen.
As well, writers use different parts of their brains when they type than when you write by hand. Typing tends to draw on the analytical brain and handwriting on the emotional side. I can’t write poetry directly on a computer. When I finish the edits on paper, I enter the corrections back into the word processor.
The last step is to read the work out loud to myself. When I voice the text, missing words, mistakes and inconsistencies pop out.
Children today are thrust into the adult world with little or no perpetration. I am no prude, yet I'm concerned young people are being robbed of their childhood as they are bombarded with subjects and the portrayal of situations they don't fully understand to form twisted ideas about human relationships both social and personal. We, as adults, are responsible to guide them without oppressing them so they can explore the world and their emotions in safe environments. The Internet removes that guidance. AI will exasperate the ability to gently introduce children into adulthood as they grow. This has affected our societies for decades and created an infantile culture. Responsibility is overridden with the constant hunt for instant gratification and entertainment. The road back begins with children. They look to adults and mimic them. If adults fail to teach respect and compassion without perspective, our socialites will move further and further away from civility.
As I write, I make the work entertaining and build interesting characters. At the same time, my books express my artists intentions with themes presented as stories and not lectures. One of the themes I explore is gender equality.
This morning, on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) magazine format radio program The Current, there was a half hour discussion about the history of pockets with a particular emphasis on how women’s garments lack them, or the pockets are so small they’re useless.
Men have had useful pockets since the 15th century. Women’s garments only saw pockets in off-the-shelf products in the early 20th century, and they were mostly for show. Woman have spoken and written about this exclusion for centuries. It was raised during the women’s suffrage movement. Even today, pockets on women’s clothes are so small a smart phone can’t fit into them. They must be carried in handbags, which one suffragette referred to as, “The bag of oppression.”
In Beyond the shallow Bank, my historical women’s fiction novel with elements of Celtic mythology, the main character, Margaret Talbot, lives in the male dominated society of 1901, but she doesn’t simply accept her supposed place. Here is a quote from the book concerning women and pockets.
“She got down from the wagon, tucked the sketchbook under one arm and slid a pencil into the pocket she had sewn into her skirt, wondering, as she had many times before, why women’s garments were not designed with such a useful feature.”
Later in the book, Margaret comments on the privileges enjoyed only by men as she defies convention.
There's a rude and inaccurate phrase being spread in online writing groups, "Plotter or Pantser." It implies those who plot out a story in an outline first are professionals and those who don't are amateurishly flying by the seat of their pants. There are professionals who plot with outlines and professionals who don’t.
We who don’t are not flying by the seat of our pants. We start with characters and a situation. As we write, we place characters under pressure and see how they react. That reaction revels the characters true natures, moves the story forward and examines the themes presented, all of which we don’t know in the beginning because we’re discovering our own perspectives and the nature of the world as we uncover the story. The words plot and story are sometimes used interchangeably, yet are quite different. Plot consists of the incidents. Story consists of the incidents, world building and character development. People want to read stories, not plots.
James Patterson writes detailed, chapter by chapter outlines before he puts down a single word of prose. This obviously works for him because he’s a bestselling author and people love his well written books. He’s writing a particular type if book, a puzzle that he lays out, cuts up with a jigsaw and assembles in front of readers. He also works with collaborators He'll give the outline to another author who will write some chapters or the entire book. An outline makes this easier.
If plotting an outline works for you, that’s what you should do. Just don’t use rude terms like pantser for those who don’t. Stephen King, Salmon Rushdie and Margaret Atwood never create outlines or character sheets before putting down prose. None of them can be considered struggling armatures.
